Building Future Worlds Out of Inner Despair

The most iconic science fiction tales sometimes arise not from victory or happiness, but from the trenches of inner struggle. Suffering, confusion, loss, and existential crisis—these are not merely melodramatic elements for a hero’s journey. They are the very engine that propels some of the most compelling worldbuilding in fiction. At the crossroads of inner desperation and visionary imagination is a great space where worlds are created in the future—not as escapes, but as reflections of oneself and the societies we inhabit. The book’s core story is about the author Jason Borbidge’s sacrifice, spiritual disintegration, and incessant quest for meaning. The milieu—a desolate vastness, a choking bureaucracy, and covert universal truths—serves not merely as a backdrop. It’s also a mirror of the main character’s interior turmoil. This dynamic—in which inner desolation becomes reflected in the outer world—provides a roadmap for how creators can translate personal suffering into epic, imaginative worlds.

When Suffering Leads to Inspiration

Despair tends to cause us to have to face the truths we suppress in the drudgery of daily life. It eliminates the safety of familiar systems and beliefs. When all collapses—whether emotionally, spiritually, or intellectually—the mind starts to look beyond the material world for meaning. Here, futuristic worldbuilding starts. It is no accident that some of the most powerful science fiction writers penned their works during periods of intense personal adversity or social breakdown. Orwell, Dick, Le Guin, Butler, and others—all drew upon shared or personal despair to create realities that were distorted, twisted, or dystopian, but always emotionally grounded. In HOLOGRAM, the hero isn’t a typical one. He’s broken, unsure, possibly shattered. And yet it’s because he is that he finds his way toward unveiling universal mysteries and defying the paradigms that exist about him. His world—a twisted, stratified, nightmarish place—is a representation of his own soul’s progress. For novelists and creatives, this means a highly effective way of writing: don’t create your setting first; write from feeling instead. Let desperation inform the topography.

Worldbuilding Through the Lens of Suffering

Pain changes perception. When you’re going through inner turmoil, the world appears different—sharper, more threatening, or sometimes more surreal. Translating that altered perception into fiction results in environments that feel deeply immersive because they are emotionally resonant. In the book, the world is a universe of endless shadows, hidden facts, and administrative mazes. This is not merely science fiction set design. It’s symbolism—a reflection of the mind of the protagonist. Consider how despair could affect the following aspects of an imaginary future world:

  • Architecture: Is the city constructed of suffocating towers that shut out the sun? Or is it a crumbling sprawl where technology buzzes but nothing seems alive?
  • Technology: Is it cold and unfeeling, working for those in power while disregarding the emotional requirements of the people?
  • Social Structure: Does bureaucracy hold sway, compelling people into loveless roles? Are individuals judged by algorithms, figures, or ancient dogma masquerading as modern law?

Every one of these things doesn’t simply flavor them—they’re metaphors. They describe the soul of the world, which is the soul of the person dreaming it up.

A Mirror and a Map

Utopian worlds constructed out of despair tend to operate on two levels: they serve as a mirror, holding up our current plight, and as a map, providing possible ways forward—or cautions against ways not to go. In HOLOGRAM, the darkness isn’t literal. It’s philosophical. The bureaucracy isn’t merely annoying—it’s crushing to the soul. And the revelations aren’t merely plot twists—they’re existential questions in disguise. These are things that resonate because they’re not random—they’re a product of the protagonist’s inner life. We feel them as readers because we’ve felt them. For writers, this is a powerful reminder: when constructing fictional worlds, use your emotional truth as the map. What do you fear? What systems have failed you? What do you wish to escape, repair, or expose? These questions not only operate worldbuilding but also make it significant.

The Power of Change

One of the most significant elements of working from despair is the change that may happen—not only for the characters or the world, but for the artist as well. Worldbuilding as therapy. Take despair and put it out there in the world, concretize it into buildings, systems, and wars, and you can control it. You can shape it, change it, and solve it in ways that reality cannot. That’s the best of science fiction—it’s not predictive, it’s therapeutic.

When an author creates a world where a fractured character finds truth in spite of oppression and inner anguish, it sends a definitive message: despair does not exclude understanding. In fact, it is possibly the very thing that opens the door. In HOLOGRAM, we witness the agonizing, ugly path of self-sacrifice for a greater truth. The hero suffers, perhaps, but through that suffering, new horizons are created—both for himself and humanity. That’s the alchemy. That’s the true hologram: projecting pain into possibility.

Conclusion 

It’s easy to run from despair—to push it away, divert attention from it, or refuse to see it. But in the world of fiction, and particularly in science fiction, darkness is not the enemy. It’s raw material. Whether you’re a writer, artist, thinker, or simply someone working through your own emotional terrain, think about the creative possibilities of your despair. What kind of world might you create out of it? What truths reside within it? What systems might be torn down or reimagined due to what you’ve experienced? The book is more than science fiction—it’s a reminder that even in a shadow world, the quest for meaning can generate light. And sometimes, the farthest-off futures are spawned by the deepest inner emptiness.

Comments are closed.